epporsimuove: (Default)
[personal profile] epporsimuove
So I went to yoga, ate dinner (eggs in spicy tomato sauce…mmm), and watched an episode of Farscape and Glee. I think I have finally calmed down enough to talk about Oklahoma.

Last Friday (23 April 2010), Governor Brad Henry vetoed two anti-abortion bills passed by the Oklahoma congress. He signed a third bill mandating new signed in the offices of abortion providers.

Today, the Oklahoma State Senate voted 36-12 to overturn the governor’s veto.

The first bill (HB 2780) requires women to undergo an ultrasound and listen to a detail description of the fetus before having an abortion. It also requires a vaginal ultrasound instead of a non-invasive ultrasound in cases where an internal ultrasound would show a clearer picture of the fetus (in early pregnancy, this is almost always true).

The biggest problem with this bill (there are many), the reason the governor vetoed it, is that the bill does not contain exemptions for incest and rape. So rape victims who become pregnant will have to look at the evidence of their rape, have it explained to them piece by piece, and this will likely occur after they have had a foreign object inserted into them.

36 Oklahoma Senators think this is acceptable.

The second (HB 2656) says:

“In a wrongful life action or a wrongful birth action, no damages may be recovered for any condition that existed at the time of a child’s birth if the claim is that the defendant’s [doctor’s] omission contributed to the mother’s not having obtained an abortion.” HB 2656: Section 1.C

I’ll let you think about that one for a minute.

If you are a pregnant woman in Oklahoma, the State Senate has just declared it okay for your doctor to lie to you. If your doctor thinks you might have an abortion if you find out your child has any non-lethal condition, your doctor CAN LIE TO YOU. And you cannot sue him or her.

The Center for Reproductive Rights already has lawsuits filed against these two new laws, and I believe they will be declared unconstitutional, but we can not be sure. However, even if they are thrown out, these two laws showcase a disturbing trend in anti-abortion feelings in the United States. The trend is that saving a fetus is more important than the pregnant woman.

The ultrasound bill specifically excludes any “emotional, psychological, and mental conditions” from being a valid reason for exemption from the ultrasound and description procedures. So, in other words, a woman’s emotions and brain are unimportant. Only her body has worth. This, combined with the recent mailing calling for Rep. Betty Sutton to “get back in the kitchen” makes me feel like I am living in the 1950’s.

I’m pissed.

BTW: The title is from the song "Oklahoma" from the ridiculously funny musical Dirty Rotten Scoundrels.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-04-28 07:58 am (UTC)
silveradept: The emblem of the Heartless, a heart with an X of thorns and a fleur-de-lis at the bottom instead of the normal point. (Heartless)
From: [personal profile] silveradept
We, too, are twitching and looking for metaphorical sharp pointy objects to satisfy our STABSTAB reflex.

No exceptions, and it's okay for a doctor to lie. What part of "First, do no harm" says "but only if it's not a woman."?

I think it would be proper justice to the state of Oklahoma if all the women in it packed up and left until these bills are repealed, and the earth of the political candidates who voted to make them law has been salted.

And what's worse is that there are still two more bills that could potentially get passed by override...


epporsimuove: (Default)

August 2010

89101112 1314
1516 1718192021

Most Popular Tags

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags